This MILCON Requirements, Standardization, and Integration (MRSI) site presents Military Construction policy, regulations, standards, and designs in order to provide the facility community with the tools they need to build and maintain the Army's vast facility infrastructure.

This site is part of research initiatives conducted at the Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL), (the Illinois Site of the Engineer Research and Development Center.) Partnering with federal and industry organizations, our mission is to enhance the proficiency and productivity of the Corps’ construction community for planning, design, and execution of the Corps’ facility acquisition process: we do this by providing tools and curated information for this community. This site and the tools provided herein are part of that research, as lessons learned from interacting with the community are incorporated into future tools and research programs.

Current research initiatives being investigated based on what we have learned from interacting with the community through our tools include:
  • Document Generation

    Our current document generation tool is the MRSI Web Wizard, which is the third generation of our Wizard concept. We have created a unified wizard tool, based on a current web software development stack that can produce disparate document types with a WYSIWYG user interface, while maintaining the capability to support agency-specific requirements. Prior experience led us to conclude that most of the documents we were being asked to help produce had two common elements: a template that defined the format of the standard document and delineated what type of document would be produced (i.e., would it be the next great American novel or a fast food window receipt?) which was mostly boilerplate, but with sections of it being variable text dictated by the specifics of the project gathered as user input. The term varitext was coined to represent this second element and research commenced on how to use this insight to meet the goals for the new tool.

    The result of this research was varitext objects embedded within the templates that allow us to encapsulate everything about that portion of the document within them: the prompt the user is presented to request the needed input, how it is presented, what is done with the user’s response, and how the document is modified based on said input. By treating the non-boilerplate portions of the document as varitext, we can update our documents over time as requirements change without having to change source code. This makes not only updates in existing modules faster, less error-prone, and more secure but also means new modules/programs for additional document types can be deployed much faster than was previously possible.

  • LEED Scorecard

    We are researching the development of a system that can recommend opportunities for LEED credits to upcoming projects based on historical location data (e.g. installation site or climate zone), where the data can show which LEED credits were given for similar projects. Such an endeavor may involve searching knowledge management systems across USACE that contain lessons learned, white papers, and other sources to help speed decision making.

  • EPDRDR - Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) Repository Demonstration and Reporting

    Environmental Product Declarations, known as EPDs, provide a standard way of declaring the impacts of manufacturing and using products through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Construction products are assessed using a single set of Product Category Rules (PCRs) ensuring consistent reporting for similar products. EPDs for construction products in Europe use the European Standard EN 15804 as their PCR to ensure that the information is provided using the same LCA rules with the same environmental indicators such that information for disparate products can be brought together to summarize the environmental impacts for a building. EPDs should always be independently verified by an expert familiar with the product category.

    The focus of our research would be to compare EPDs across USACE construction projects to established baselines to evaulate their effectiveness. Are we failing to meet guidelines, or do we exceed them? We have initiated discussions with other agencies (GSA and EPA) as they are ahead of DoD using and analyzing EPDs.
    Data collected and analysis provided through this project will influence the development and refinement of thresholds for the embodied carbon of building materials used throughout DoD.